2002 Acura RSX vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 562 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Acura | DAF |
Model | RSX | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 33 L |