2002 Acura RSX vs. 1966 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 803 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1966 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RSX | DeVille |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 2025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 82 L |