2002 Acura RSX vs. 1966 Citroen Ak 350
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 625 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | RSX | Ak 350 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 22 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 41 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 605 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 19 L |