2002 Acura RSX vs. 1966 Volvo 144
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Volvo 144. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Volvo 144 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 99 more horse power than 1966 Volvo 144. (124 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1966 Volvo 144. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Volvo 144 weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1966 Volvo 144 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Volvo 144. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Volvo 144. (167 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Volvo 144.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1966 Volvo 144 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RSX | 144 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 124 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 167 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1290 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2620 mm |