2002 Acura RSX vs. 1967 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,952 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Cadillac DeVille (288 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 778 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1967 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Acura | Cadillac |
Model | RSX | DeVille |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 6952 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 82 L |