2002 Acura RSX vs. 1968 Citroen 2CV
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 205 more horse power than 1968 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1968 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 670 kg more than 1968 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1968 Citroen 2CV has manual transmission. 1968 Citroen 2CV will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1968 Citroen 2CV | |
Make | Acura | Citroen |
Model | RSX | 2CV |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 425 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |