2002 Acura RSX vs. 1968 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (114 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1968 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 60 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Nissan Cedric. (165 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1968 Nissan Cedric | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | RSX | Cedric |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 114 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 165 Nm |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1290 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4700 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
