2002 Acura RSX vs. 1969 Datsun 1600
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Datsun 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Datsun 1600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Datsun 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Datsun 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1969 Datsun 1600 | |
Make | Acura | Datsun |
Model | RSX | 1600 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |