2002 Acura RSX vs. 1969 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 109 more horse power than 1969 NSU Ro 80. (114 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1969 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 36 kg more than 1969 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1969 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Acura | NSU |
Model | RSX | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1969 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 188 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1194 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |