2002 Acura RSX vs. 1973 Austin 1800
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Austin 1800. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Austin 1800 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1973 Austin 1800. (86 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1973 Austin 1800. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 40 kg more than 1973 Austin 1800. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Austin 1800. (141 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Austin 1800.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1973 Austin 1800 | |
Make | Acura | Austin |
Model | RSX | 1800 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 141 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 49 L |