2002 Acura RSX vs. 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240 would be higher. At 2,404 cc (4 cylinders), 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 160 more horse power than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240. (63 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240.
Because 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240. (138 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1973 Mercedes-Benz 240 | |
Make | Acura | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RSX | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 138 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 65 L |