2002 Acura RSX vs. 1976 Dodge Aspen
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Dodge Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Dodge Aspen would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Dodge Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 123 more horse power than 1976 Dodge Aspen. (100 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1976 Dodge Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Dodge Aspen weights approximately 255 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1976 Dodge Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Dodge Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1976 Dodge Aspen (231 Nm) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1976 Dodge Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1976 Dodge Aspen | |
Make | Acura | Dodge |
Model | RSX | Aspen |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3687 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 231 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2870 mm |