2002 Acura RSX vs. 1979 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 276 kg more than 1979 Toyota Celica.
Because 1979 Toyota Celica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Toyota Celica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1979 Toyota Celica has manual transmission. 1979 Toyota Celica will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1979 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | RSX | Celica |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1588 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 954 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2510 mm |