2002 Acura RSX vs. 1979 Volvo 164
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Volvo 164. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Volvo 164 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1979 Volvo 164 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1979 Volvo 164. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1979 Volvo 164.
Because 1979 Volvo 164 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1979 Volvo 164. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Volvo 164 (205 Nm) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1979 Volvo 164 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1979 Volvo 164 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RSX | 164 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1979 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2664 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 205 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3350 mm |