2002 Acura RSX vs. 1980 Bristol Britannia
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Bristol Britannia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Bristol Britannia would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1980 Bristol Britannia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Bristol Britannia weights approximately 522 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1980 Bristol Britannia is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Bristol Britannia. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1980 Bristol Britannia | |
Make | Acura | Bristol |
Model | RSX | Britannia |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1752 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2910 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 82 L |