2002 Acura RSX vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 176 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 408 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
Make | Acura | Volvo |
Model | RSX | 66 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 822 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1550 mm |