2002 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Opel Ascona
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1982 Opel Ascona. (115 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Opel Ascona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 158 kg more than 1982 Opel Ascona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Opel Ascona. (150 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1982 Opel Ascona | |
| Make | Acura | Opel |
| Model | RSX | Ascona |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1796 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1072 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1670 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |
