2002 Acura RSX vs. 1982 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 2,563 cc, 1982 Toyota Celica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 104 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Celica. (119 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Celica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 50 kg more than 1982 Toyota Celica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Toyota Celica (215 Nm) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1982 Toyota Celica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1982 Toyota Celica | |
| Make | Acura | Toyota |
| Model | RSX | Celica |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2563 cc |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 215 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4610 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
