2002 Acura RSX vs. 1984 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Cadillac Eldorado would be higher. At 4,078 cc (8 cylinders), 1984 Cadillac Eldorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. (133 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1984 Cadillac Eldorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1984 Cadillac Eldorado weights approximately 460 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Cadillac Eldorado (270 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1984 Cadillac Eldorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1984 Cadillac Eldorado | |
| Make | Acura | Cadillac |
| Model | RSX | Eldorado |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4078 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 133 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 270 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5190 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2900 mm |
