2002 Acura RSX vs. 1984 Dodge Colt
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge Colt. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge Colt would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1984 Dodge Colt. (87 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge Colt. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 80 kg more than 1984 Dodge Colt. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Dodge Colt. (146 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Dodge Colt.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1984 Dodge Colt | |
| Make | Acura | Dodge |
| Model | RSX | Colt |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 146 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
