2002 Acura RSX vs. 1984 Mini MK V

To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Mini MK V. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Mini MK V would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1984 Mini MK V. (41 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1984 Mini MK V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 605 kg more than 1984 Mini MK V. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Mini MK V. (71 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Mini MK V. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1984 Mini MK V has manual transmission. 1984 Mini MK V will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: