2002 Acura RSX vs. 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,473 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (89 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 60 kg more than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (179 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1984 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Acura | Oldsmobile |
Model | RSX | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2473 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 179 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |