2002 Acura RSX vs. 1994 Nissan Cima
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Nissan Cima. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Nissan Cima would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 1994 Nissan Cima is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Nissan Cima weights approximately 308 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1994 Nissan Cima is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1994 Nissan Cima. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1994 Nissan Cima | |
Make | Acura | Nissan |
Model | RSX | Cima |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |