2002 Acura RSX vs. 1994 Volvo 850
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Volvo 850. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Volvo 850 would be higher. At 2,319 cc (5 cylinders), 1994 Volvo 850 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1994 Volvo 850 (240 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1994 Volvo 850 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Volvo 850 (407 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 1994 Volvo 850 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1994 Volvo 850 has manual transmission. 1994 Volvo 850 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1994 Volvo 850 | |
| Make | Acura | Volvo |
| Model | RSX | 850 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2319 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 407 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4670 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2670 mm |
