2002 Acura RSX vs. 1995 Daewoo Brougham
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Daewoo Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Daewoo Brougham would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1995 Daewoo Brougham. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Daewoo Brougham weights approximately 78 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1995 Daewoo Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Daewoo Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1995 Daewoo Brougham | |
| Make | Acura | Daewoo |
| Model | RSX | Brougham |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 158 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1222 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2680 mm |
