2002 Acura RSX vs. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Chrysler Phaeton would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 252 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 1997 Chrysler Phaeton | |
Make | Acura | Chrysler |
Model | RSX | Phaeton |
Year Released | 2002 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 475 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3360 mm |