2002 Acura RSX vs. 1998 Rover 400
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 400 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1998 Rover 400. (109 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 400.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 400. (145 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 400. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1998 Rover 400 has manual transmission. 1998 Rover 400 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 1998 Rover 400 | |
| Make | Acura | Rover |
| Model | RSX | 400 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1589 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 109 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2560 mm |
