2002 Acura RSX vs. 2000 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Toyota Mark II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Toyota Mark II would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 2000 Toyota Mark II. (156 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2000 Toyota Mark II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 280 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 2000 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Toyota Mark II (200 Nm) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2000 Toyota Mark II will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2000 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Acura | Toyota |
Model | RSX | Mark II |
Year Released | 2002 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 200 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1510 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |