2002 Acura RSX vs. 2001 Daewoo Lanos
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Daewoo Lanos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Daewoo Lanos would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 118 more horse power than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (105 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 195 kg more than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Daewoo Lanos. (150 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Daewoo Lanos.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 2001 Daewoo Lanos | |
| Make | Acura | Daewoo |
| Model | RSX | Lanos |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1398 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 105 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1035 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 48 L |
