2002 Acura RSX vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | Acura | Ford |
Model | RSX | Ecosport |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 143 HP |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2490 mm |