2002 Acura RSX vs. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo
To start off, 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (123 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo weights approximately 145 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo. (180 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2003 Mercedes-Benz Vaneo | |
Make | Acura | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | RSX | Vaneo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1898 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 180 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |