2002 Acura RSX vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2003 Subaru R2 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (44 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 430 kg more than 2003 Subaru R2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Acura | Subaru |
Model | RSX | R2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 44 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 58 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 30 L |