2002 Acura RSX vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Nissan X-Trail weights approximately 55 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (193 Nm) has 1 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 2004 Nissan X-Trail has manual transmission. 2004 Nissan X-Trail will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Acura RSX | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Acura | Nissan |
| Model | RSX | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 223 HP | 143 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 193 Nm | 192 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1285 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
