2002 Acura RSX vs. 2005 Saab 9-2x
To start off, 2005 Saab 9-2x is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9-2x (227 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9-2x should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9-2x weights approximately 212 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Saab 9-2x is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9-2x will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9-2x (294 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9-2x will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2005 Saab 9-2x | |
Make | Acura | Saab |
Model | RSX | 9-2x |
Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 294 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1442 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2530 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |