2002 Acura RSX vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt. (179 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Colt.
Because 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 2006 Mitsubishi Colt has manual transmission. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Acura | Mitsubishi |
Model | RSX | Colt |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 255 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2970 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 95 L |