2002 Acura RSX vs. 2009 Bentley Brooklands
To start off, 2009 Bentley Brooklands is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 6,761 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Bentley Brooklands is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Bentley Brooklands (523 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Bentley Brooklands should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 2009 Bentley Brooklands is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Bentley Brooklands. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Bentley Brooklands (774 Nm) has 581 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2009 Bentley Brooklands will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2009 Bentley Brooklands | |
Make | Acura | Bentley |
Model | RSX | Brooklands |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 6761 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 523 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 774 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3120 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 96 L |