2002 Acura RSX vs. 2009 Chevrolet Uplander
To start off, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 3,880 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chevrolet Uplander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander (240 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 155 kg more than 2009 Chevrolet Uplander.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet Uplander (325 Nm) has 132 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2009 Chevrolet Uplander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2009 Chevrolet Uplander | |
Make | Acura | Chevrolet |
Model | RSX | Uplander |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3880 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 240 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 325 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 5200 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 95 L |