2002 Acura RSX vs. 2009 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2009 Honda CR-V is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,354 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 2009 Honda CR-V. (166 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 2009 Honda CR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Honda CR-V weights approximately 231 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Honda CR-V (218 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2009 Honda CR-V will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2009 Honda CR-V | |
Make | Acura | Honda |
Model | RSX | CR-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 2354 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 166 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 218 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 1461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |