2002 Acura RSX vs. 2009 Mazda CX-9

To start off, 2009 Mazda CX-9 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 3,726 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Mazda CX-9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (273 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mazda CX-9 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Mazda CX-9 weights approximately 99 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mazda CX-9 (366 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2009 Mazda CX-9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Acura RSX 2009 Mazda CX-9
Make Acura Mazda
Model RSX CX-9
Year Released 2002 2009
Body Type Coupe SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1999 cc 3726 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 223 HP 273 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6250 RPM
Torque 193 Nm 366 Nm
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Vehicle Weight 1230 kg 1329 kg
Vehicle Length 4380 mm 5080 mm
Vehicle Width 1730 mm 1940 mm
Wheelbase Size 2540 mm 2880 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 65 L 76 L