2002 Acura RSX vs. 2010 Audi A6
To start off, 2010 Audi A6 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi A6 (350 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 2010 Audi A6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi A6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi A6 (440 Nm) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2010 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2010 Audi A6 | |
Make | Acura | Audi |
Model | RSX | A6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 440 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4934 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1862 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2833 mm |