2002 Acura RSX vs. 2010 Holden Barina
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Barina (197 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Barina will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 2010 Holden Barina has manual transmission. 2010 Holden Barina will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2010 Holden Barina | |
Make | Acura | Holden |
Model | RSX | Barina |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 193 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1650 mm |