2002 Acura RSX vs. 2012 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Korando is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 SsangYong Korando (175 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (158 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX.
Because 2012 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Acura RSX. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 SsangYong Korando has automatic transmission and 2002 Acura RSX has manual transmission. 2002 Acura RSX will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 SsangYong Korando will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2012 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Acura | SsangYong |
Model | RSX | Korando |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 158 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |