2002 Acura RSX vs. 2013 Acura MDX
To start off, 2013 Acura MDX is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Acura RSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Acura RSX would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Acura MDX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Acura MDX (300 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2002 Acura RSX. (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Acura MDX should accelerate faster than 2002 Acura RSX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Acura MDX weights approximately 839 kg more than 2002 Acura RSX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Acura MDX (366 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Acura RSX. (193 Nm). This means 2013 Acura MDX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Acura RSX.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura RSX | 2013 Acura MDX | |
Make | Acura | Acura |
Model | RSX | MDX |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1999 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 193 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1230 kg | 2069 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4380 mm | 4867 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2238 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 79 L |