2002 Acura TL vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 2002 Acura TL is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura TL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1995 Rover 200. (197 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1995 Rover 200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura TL weights approximately 429 kg more than 1995 Rover 200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura TL (315 Nm) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Rover 200. (233 Nm). This means 2002 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Rover 200.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura TL | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | TL | 200 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 233 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1185 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1410 mm |