2002 Acura TL vs. 1998 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Acura TL is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura TL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1998 Rover 75. (111 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1998 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura TL weights approximately 94 kg more than 1998 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura TL (315 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Rover 75. (260 Nm). This means 2002 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura TL | 1998 Rover 75 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | TL | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 111 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 260 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |