2002 Acura TL vs. 1999 Rover 75
To start off, 2002 Acura TL is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Rover 75. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Rover 75 would be higher. At 3,212 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura TL (223 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1999 Rover 75. (175 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura TL should accelerate faster than 1999 Rover 75. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura TL weights approximately 174 kg more than 1999 Rover 75. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura TL (315 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Rover 75. (240 Nm). This means 2002 Acura TL will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Rover 75.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Acura TL | 1999 Rover 75 | |
Make | Acura | Rover |
Model | TL | 75 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3212 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 223 HP | 175 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 315 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1614 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2750 mm |