2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (246 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1951 Allard K2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1951 Allard K2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Allard K2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1951 Allard K2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Allard |
Model | 147 | K2 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3179 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 246 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2700 mm |