2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1964 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Cadillac DeVille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Cadillac DeVille would be higher. At 6,390 cc (8 cylinders), 1964 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 782 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147.
Because 1964 Cadillac DeVille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Cadillac DeVille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1964 Cadillac DeVille | |
| Make | Alfa Romeo | Cadillac |
| Model | 147 | DeVille |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3179 cc | 6390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 246 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1360 kg | 2142 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4220 mm | 5720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |
