2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,482 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (131 HP @ 5550 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 95 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (275 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (203 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Alfa Romeo 147 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | 147 | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2482 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 113 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 275 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 76.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.4:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1345 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4180 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2600 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 54 L |