2002 Alfa Romeo 147 vs. 1986 Jaguar XJ6

To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Jaguar XJ6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Jaguar XJ6 would be higher. At 2,918 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. (113 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Jaguar XJ6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Jaguar XJ6 weights approximately 375 kg more than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Jaguar XJ6 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Jaguar XJ6. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 (275 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Jaguar XJ6. (239 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Jaguar XJ6.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Alfa Romeo 147 1986 Jaguar XJ6
Make Alfa Romeo Jaguar
Model 147 XJ6
Year Released 2002 1986
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 2918 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 113 HP 165 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 275 Nm 239 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 91 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 74.8 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.4:1 12.6:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1345 kg 1720 kg
Vehicle Length 4180 mm 4940 mm
Vehicle Width 1740 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2600 mm 2880 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]